【】as a source only in limited situations.
Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia. 。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the。Daily Mail。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable."。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending。The 。 Daily Mail。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the 。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail 。
.。
Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews.。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。Thanks for signing up!。
One user commented with a "strong oppose" comment that "The 。Daily Mail 。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people."。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock 。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication." 。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the 。Mail。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source.。 The 。 Mail。joins the。 National Enquirer。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular.。
The Sun 。
and the 。
Daily Mirror。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources.。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese.。Featured Video For You 。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump。
相关文章
New Zealand designer's photo series celebrates the elegance of aging
Not only is age nothin’ but a number -- it can be a asset when it comes to style.。 That’2024-11-21- 大連梅州確認將承辦中超首階段賽事 足協正全力爭取日照_賽區_賽季_工作www.ty42.com 日期:2022-04-29 18:31:00| 評論(已有342889條評論)2024-11-21
- 沈夢雨加時中柱&助攻 凱爾特人女足晉級蘇格蘭杯決賽_比賽_哈茨_獎杯www.ty42.com 日期:2022-05-01 22:31:00| 評論(已有343110條評論)2024-11-21
- 泰山再負大邱難逃1分宿命 亞冠謝幕戰還有小目標_比賽_浦和紅鑽_對手www.ty42.com 日期:2022-04-30 09:31:00| 評論(已有342915條評論)2024-11-21
J.K. Rowling makes 'Harry Potter' joke about Olympics event
LONDON -- For anyone who isn't familiar with the Olympics omnium events in the velodrome, the points2024-11-21- 吳龑發文告別河南隊 :信守承諾感恩懷德 但願明年中超重逢_建業_長安_競技www.ty42.com 日期:2022-04-29 16:31:00| 評論(已有342878條評論)2024-11-21
最新评论