【】as a source only in limited situations.

Prepare yourself for less celebrity gossip on Wikipedia. 。
Editors for the site (who are all volunteers) voted Wednesday to almost entirely ban the British tabloid newspaper the 。Daily Mail 。as a source, calling the publication "generally unreliable." 。
SEE ALSO:Early newspaper editions could not keep up with that legendary Super Bowl ending 。The。 Daily Mail。's reliability has been a point of contention on the user-edited encyclopedia site since 2015 if not earlier. But discussion about its efficacy as a source was revived in early January when one user led the campaign against the 。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail。
. 。

Editor Hillbillyholiday argued during a discussion that the outlet is untrustworthy for science-related stories, inappropriately posts photos of children and has limited credibility even with direct quotes and interviews. 。 Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the。Those opposed could not support a blanket banning but agreed on a comprise: to use the 。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。 By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. 。Thanks for signing up!。

Daily Mail。
, as hated as it is, is a very mixed bag. It can contain wonderful information such as accurate and informative interviews with highly respected people." 。 The Daily Mail was dragged through the mud on a Wikipedia discussion about its reliability.Credit: Steve Meddle/REX/Shutterstock。 Ultimately, though, the news outlet has been effectively banned as a source, due to its "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication."。
The Wikimedia Foundation, who runs the main Wiki site, pointed out that the outlet isn't fully banned -- its use as a reference is just "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.” But the key takeaway is that the。 Daily Mail 。Daily Mail 。
is no longer a go-to reliable source for citing something on a page.。 The ruling does not mean the 。Mail。 can never be used as a source, but editors are being encouraged to change information that cites the publication to a different source. 。 The。 Mail 。joins the。 National Enquirer。among the few outlets that Wikipedia has called out in particular. 。
The Sun。
and the 。
Daily Mirror。
are also seen as unreliable. Wikipedia also warns against using state-run media like China's Xinhua or Iran's Press TV as sources.。Additional reporting by Jason Abbruzzese.。Featured Video For You 。Even Fox News is defending CNN against Trump 。
相关文章
Two astronauts just installed a new parking spot on the International Space Station
UPDATE: Aug. 19, 2016, 2:04 p.m. EDT 。 Astronauts Kate Rubins and Jeff Williams are back in the Inter2025-04-03- 哈蘭德帽子戲法助曼城逆轉,利物浦閃電九連鞭9-0狂勝伯恩茅斯_哈蘭德_利物浦_閃電www.ty42.com 日期:2022-08-28 13:01:00| 評論(已有349288條評論)2025-04-03
菲米爆發,埃利奧特 、卡瓦略進球!利物浦九球發泄輸曼聯的怨氣
菲米爆發,埃利奧特、卡瓦略進球 !利物浦九球發泄輸曼聯的怨氣_克洛普_傳球_埃利奧特www.ty42.com 日期:2022-08-28 07:31:00| 評論(已有349216條評論)2025-04-03- 安布:尤文今天鬆開油門太早了,他們過早地開始控製比賽_阿萊格裏_羅馬_下半場www.ty42.com 日期:2022-08-28 06:01:00| 評論(已有349200條評論)2025-04-03
Pokémon Go is so big that it has its own VR porn parody now
Behind every great entertainment property there's a cheekily named porn parody. Super Hornio Bros. G2025-04-03- 老友相聚 !伊布社媒曬與米哈伊洛維奇合照_博洛尼亞_比賽_米蘭www.ty42.com 日期:2022-08-28 11:31:00| 評論(已有349265條評論)2025-04-03
最新评论