【】
Following a much buzzed-about trailer, Alex Garland's political action thriller Civil Warhad its world premiere at SXSW last Thursday, garnering a slew of rave reviews. The reaction online since then — both to the movie itself and reviews out of the film festival — have been divisive, which might have been Garland's purpose.
Set during a second American Civil War in a not-so-distant future, the film follows four journalists (Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Priscilla's Cailee Spaeny, and Stephen McKinley Henderson) on a road trip through the war-torn U.S. on a quest to interview the president (Nick Offerman) before secessionist forces invade Washington, D.C.
SEE ALSO:'Civil War' review: Alex Garland's latest is more 'Men,' less 'Ex Machina'The A24 film doesn't open in theaters until April 12. But that hasn't stopped social media users from conversing about the film from the title alone.
With reviews out of SXSW confirming that the movie is about the power of journalism rather than politics, some on social are going to war over it.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Maybe "going to war" is a bit hyperbolic. But having seen Civil Warmyself at its SXSW premiere, it's strange to see such opinionated takes ahead of its wide release. These divisive reactions might support Garland's point about the dangers of an "us versus them" mentality, whatever the politics. (Though personally, I found the film's apolitical approach unconvincing.)
To begin with, there was a lot of confusion about why California and Texas would team up in a civil war together.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Others state that because the film's focus is on war journalism, any debate about the movie's politics is deliberately missing the point. Or they suggest that negative reactions to the movie's apolitical approach have drawn ire because Garland didn't validate the political stance of the viewers as they thought he should.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
However, some felt it was weird to release this film during an election year and not have anything to say but "both sides bad."
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Garland knows his film will be divisive; he admitted as much in his interview with The Hollywood Reportersaying that the film is intentionally "trying to create a conversation about political divisiveness" that "vilifies the other side." Whether or not that decision to stir the pot will be good for the film's box office remains to be seen. You'll just have to wait to see Civil War yourself.
Civil War hits theaters on April 12.
TopicsFilmSocial MediaPolitics
相关文章

Fake news reports from the Newseum are infinitely better than actual news
Actual investigative journalism: who needs it?At least, that's what some people will likely conclude2026-04-08
專訪郝偉:中超還沒有開啟泰山王朝 蒿俊閔離隊要董事會批準_比賽_球員_外援www.ty42.com 日期:2022-01-12 08:01:00| 評論(已有324943條評論)2026-04-08
留洋生涯首秀!李磊首發出戰45分鍾 友誼賽草蜢隊絕平韋爾_熱身賽_莫莫_孔蒂尼www.ty42.com 日期:2022-01-12 07:31:00| 評論(已有324926條評論)2026-04-08
李霄鵬回應龐大團隊:迅速了解隊員 人多力量大_助教_主教練_工作www.ty42.com 日期:2022-01-11 22:31:00| 評論(已有324910條評論)2026-04-08
With the Pokémon Go fever still shaking half the world, there's bound to be plenty of trainer2026-04-08
曝某南方底蘊俱樂部加入欠薪矩陣 有梯隊已超一年未發錢_鄭曉蔚_球員_平球www.ty42.com 日期:2022-01-11 08:31:00| 評論(已有324788條評論)2026-04-08

最新评论