【】
Following a much buzzed-about trailer, Alex Garland's political action thriller Civil Warhad its world premiere at SXSW last Thursday, garnering a slew of rave reviews. The reaction online since then — both to the movie itself and reviews out of the film festival — have been divisive, which might have been Garland's purpose.
Set during a second American Civil War in a not-so-distant future, the film follows four journalists (Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Priscilla's Cailee Spaeny, and Stephen McKinley Henderson) on a road trip through the war-torn U.S. on a quest to interview the president (Nick Offerman) before secessionist forces invade Washington, D.C.
SEE ALSO:'Civil War' review: Alex Garland's latest is more 'Men,' less 'Ex Machina'The A24 film doesn't open in theaters until April 12. But that hasn't stopped social media users from conversing about the film from the title alone.
With reviews out of SXSW confirming that the movie is about the power of journalism rather than politics, some on social are going to war over it.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Maybe "going to war" is a bit hyperbolic. But having seen Civil Warmyself at its SXSW premiere, it's strange to see such opinionated takes ahead of its wide release. These divisive reactions might support Garland's point about the dangers of an "us versus them" mentality, whatever the politics. (Though personally, I found the film's apolitical approach unconvincing.)
To begin with, there was a lot of confusion about why California and Texas would team up in a civil war together.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Others state that because the film's focus is on war journalism, any debate about the movie's politics is deliberately missing the point. Or they suggest that negative reactions to the movie's apolitical approach have drawn ire because Garland didn't validate the political stance of the viewers as they thought he should.
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
However, some felt it was weird to release this film during an election year and not have anything to say but "both sides bad."
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Tweet may have been deleted
Garland knows his film will be divisive; he admitted as much in his interview with The Hollywood Reportersaying that the film is intentionally "trying to create a conversation about political divisiveness" that "vilifies the other side." Whether or not that decision to stir the pot will be good for the film's box office remains to be seen. You'll just have to wait to see Civil War yourself.
Civil War hits theaters on April 12.
TopicsFilmSocial MediaPolitics
相关文章
Tourist survives for month in frozen New Zealand wilderness after partner dies
A tourist from the Czech Republic, whose partner fell to his death, survived a harrowing month in th2024-12-04- 驚喜!曝前國腳蒿俊閔加盟廣州隊 力助鄭智率隊保級_武漢_比賽_球員www.ty42.com 日期:2022-08-30 18:01:00| 評論(已有349943條評論)2024-12-04
小儒尼尼奧 :梅西是世界第一人!那些隻知道射門的人不可能奪冠!
小儒尼尼奧:梅西是世界第一人!那些隻知道射門的人不可能奪冠!_姆巴佩_球員_因為www.ty42.com 日期:2022-08-30 12:01:00| 評論(已有349854條評論)2024-12-04- 吳金貴:全隊技戰術執行比較統一 曹贇定已經恢複訓練_傷病_巴索戈_對手www.ty42.com 日期:2022-08-31 22:01:00| 評論(已有350029條評論)2024-12-04
Watch MTV's Video Music Awards 2016 livestream
It's MTV Video Music Awards night. Are you ready?Kanye's going to be there, and he's going to say th2024-12-04這是什麽神仙劇情 ?姆巴佩正式回應博格巴 :如果施咒必追究到底 !
這是什麽神仙劇情?姆巴佩正式回應博格巴 :如果施咒必追究到底!_事情_法國隊_隊報www.ty42.com 日期:2022-08-30 13:31:00| 評論(已有349873條評論)2024-12-04
最新评论